<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=903950426407530&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

Welcome to the PanelShop.com Blog

This blog will bring you the latest industry news in electrical control panels, helpful Engineering tips, and more.

Integrated Safety

by

Integrated_Safety_separate_vs._integrated_systems

When looking at functionality, it is easy to trade productivity for safety, but usually machine safety is a primary concern. One way to have both is to integrate the safety functions of the machinery. Integrating safety functions into a process control system has a number of benefits, but there is debate on whether or not the two should be separated, and if so, by how much?

Integrated Systems

In any situation, there should be layers of safety precautions. One argument for their separation is that a failure of one layer should not affect the functionality of another layer; all layers should work independently of the others. However, when safety is integrated into the control system, it is easier to see data from all angles and respond more appropriately.

There is certainly a grey area in between total integration and total separation, though. It is possible for the control system and safety functions to share networks and interfaces without sharing controls and sensors. This means that a physical separation might not be the best. If both aspects of production can share the same physical base, but still be functionally separated, than a whole other set of challenges can be avoided.

Separate Systems

With two separate systems, more wiring is needed. This increases costs and makes maintenance and changes in the system much more costly and time consuming. Separate systems also have to clear hurdles of cooperation between two different operating systems and data collection methods. Training for their use is also doubled, alongside engineering efforts.

But there are still challenges with integration. These include common failures and more complex internal designs. However, benefits of integration include reduced installation costs, lower maintenance costs, and improved communication throughout a production system, along with improved flexibility of the system as a whole.

Because drastic improvements have been made in the world of integrated designs since their creation in the 80’s, it is now more economically and functionally beneficial to have integrated safety controls and process control systems, than to have two physically separate systems. Design issues have been solved - microprocessors and PLCs have ensured this - bringing greater technological advancements. So, currently, the benefits of integrated safety far outweigh the negative results.

 Discuss Safety Solutions with an Expert »

 

 

You also may be interested in reading:

 

You may also be interested in reading…

by

 

read more
by

When choosing an industrial automation

read more
by

There is a very thin but fine line between

read more
Popular Resources

Popular Resources

Outsourcing Control Panels: Free Whitepaper

Read More

Common OEM Outsourcing Mistakes to Avoid

Read More

Custom Control Panel Checklist: The Outsourcing Cheat Sheet

Read More

Five Questions to Ask When Selecting an Outsourcing Partner

Read More